12/3/2023 0 Comments Jennifer solis twitter![]() Some of the proposed drill sites are within 2,000 feet of Fairbanks Spring, a critical habitat for the endangered Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish. Fish and Wildlife Service, which manages the wildlife refuge, about the potential harm to endangered and threatened species before approving the proposed exploration activities. Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management, attorneys for the Center for Biological Diversity and the Amargosa Conservancy said federal land managers erred when they approved the exploratory mineral drilling near Ash Meadows without consulting other relevant agencies.Īttorneys for the conservation groups argue that federal land managers had an obligation under the Endangered Species Act to consult with the U.S. ![]() In the complaint filed Friday against the U.S. Work on the exploratory project could begin within weeks or even days according to a schedule outlined recently by Rover Metals CEO Judson Culter while announcing financing for the company’s Let’s Go Lithium project in Nevada. The company says it has verified high-grade lithium surface samples at its 6,000-acre project site and plans to drill a minimum of ten exploratory boreholes. Rover Metals, a Canadian mining exploration company, has proposed drilling up to 30 exploratory boreholes on public lands just north of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, a critical wetland habitat that supports a dozen endangered and threatened species. military at all times and in all places.The search for lithium has found its way to a treasured corner of the Nevada desert, resulting in a lawsuit by conservation groups who say further mining exploration could endanger a trove of species found nowhere else in the world. “Ultimately, Commanders are responsible for upholding and maintaining the high standards of the U.S. “Applicants will be evaluated per established DoD standards for the purpose of qualifying for Military Service,” the memo said. “As always, every applicant will be treated with dignity and respect,” it said, instructing commanders that recruits must be addressed by the name and gender pronoun they prefer. ![]() 8 memo advised sector and battalion commanders on “transgender applicant processing.” The Department of Defense has been getting ready for the change. To prevail, they would have to convince at least five justices that the government would suffer an “irreparable harm” if the ban on enlisting transgender personnel ended on Jan. ![]() It would be unusual if they did not file an emergency appeal in the Supreme Court. The administration’s lawyers have argued repeatedly that courts must defer to the president’s judgment on military matters. RAND had estimated that there were between 1,300 and 6,600 active duty transgender service members, Minter noted. … Experience has shown that allowing qualified transgender candidates to serve strengthens our military and our country.” Court of Appeals for recognizing that our plaintiffs simply want to serve their country. Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said “we are grateful to the D.C. In response, Justice Department spokeswoman Lauren Ehrsam said, “We disagree with the court’s ruling and are currently evaluating our next steps.” Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said, that the transgender individuals who went to court seek “to serve their nation with honor and dignity, volunteering to face extreme hardships, to endure lengthy deployments and separation from family and friends and to willingly make the ultimate sacrifice of their lives if necessary.” appeals courts - in Washington, D.C., and Virginia - refused emergency requests from the administration to lift lower court orders and maintain the enlistment ban after Jan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |